Epson printer: SureColor P600 review
Epson SureColor P600 review
Using the SC-P600 A3+ inkjet printer
...Get our Newsletter for new articles/reviews and please subscribe to Keith's YouTube Channel
...Keith's book about how to use tilt/shift lenses is now available.
Our site contains affiliate links - these help support the site. See our Advertising policies for more
The Epson P600 is the first appearance of the SureColor brand in higher end A3+ desktop printers. Although very similar in some respects to the R3000, there are a range of differences and improvements reflecting the several years difference between the introduction of these printers.
The P600 was superseded by the P700 in 2020
Keith reviewed the R3000 a few years ago, and has been able to give the new SC-P600 a thorough look over, after being loaned a brand new printer, courtesy of Epson UK.
A lot of paper and ink has gone through this printer – please do make use of the comments feature at the end if what you want to know more .
Amazon.com SC-P600 (Epson C11CE21201)
SC-P600 at B&H | SC-P600 at Adorama
SC P600 at Amazon.co.uk | SC-P600 at Wex (UK)
Epson SC-P600 review
This review concentrates on using the printer for high quality print output, rather than covering the bundled software in any great depth.
Installation and setup of the SC-P600 is covered in more detail in a separate article. We also have a review of the larger P800 printer
What do you get with the SC-P600?
The SC-P600 is well packed and comes with an install set of ink carts (in box with roll paper holders). The pile of ink cartridges behind it (in Epson’s ‘Killer Whale’ series) were sent for the review – This review includes some observations on ink usage, worth taking note of, if stocking up on spare inks.
The full technical specs. are listed at the foot of the article
In the box…
- Epson SC-P600 A3 ink jet printer
- One Photo Black UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7601)
- One Matte Black UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7608)
- One Light Black UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7607)
- One Light Light Black UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7609)
- One Cyan UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7602)
- One Light Cyan UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7605)
- One Vivid Magenta UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7603)
- One Light Magenta UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7606)
- One Yellow UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7604)
- CD print tray and software
- Roll paper holder accessory
- Single sheet guide
- Printer documentation
- CD-ROM containing printer software (Win only – Mac via download app)
Note: USB and Ethernet cables not included
Key Features (info from Epson)
- Nine-colour UltraChrome HD and Vivid Magenta ink technology
- Wide colour gamut and Epson’s highest black density (2.84 DMax on PGPP)
- Supports Epson Connect with Apple AirPrint and Google Cloud Print
- Wi-Fi Direct for direct wireless printing from smartphones, tablets and PCs
- High print speed of 153 seconds for 11×14 inch @ A3+
- Large 2.7 inch colour touch panel for simple set-up and management
- 25.9 ml ink cartridge size
- Compact footprint — 616 x 369 x 228mm (note space needed in diagram above)
The printer is quite light, compared to some of those of similar size. It’s easy to move around, even if you’re not particularly strong.
The controls and display are on a pop out panel (mouse over to see).
The ink carts are positioned to the left of the printer, under the main top cover.
Initial setup was easy, requiring the installation of the nine ink cartridges. These are starter cartridges that will provide ink to charge the tubes between the cartridges and the moving print heads. This process takes some 10-15 minutes, and is guided from the front display. The ink in the lines and print head never runs dry, so when you put your next cart in, it is what’s used first. I don’t know how muck ink is used in the setup process, but it does mean that you’ll get fewer prints from your initial set of carts.
After the setup, all carts show as full. I’ve a photo in the conclusions that gives an idea of how many prints I created before the first cart needed replacement (Vivid Light Magenta).
Many functions are directly accessible from the front display.
Connectivity
The printer is very easy to connect into a network, with 3 methods of connection.
- Hi-Speed USB 2.0
- 100Base-T Ethernet
- WiFi
There are details for setting up wired and wireless printer connections in the accompanying SC-P600 printer setup article.
Wireless LAN
- Standard: IEEE 802.11b/g/n
- Security: WPA-PSK (TKIP/AES) WPA2 compliant, WEP (64/128bit)
- Frequency Band: 2.4 GHz
- Communication Mode: Infrastructure mode, Ad hoc
The advantages of the new touch screen display are readily apparent when connecting up anywhere away from directly next to your computer. Such information may not be vital to running your printer, but immediately gives confidence when something goes wrong.
Both Apple AirPrint and Google Cloud Print are supported.
The printer was visible to my iPad without any further configuration, and even announced its presence on the network on Karen’s Mac in another office, so be prepared for shouts of ‘What’s this’ from other users on your network ;-)
We don’t have any Win PCs here to test with, but I believe almost all features of using the printer are similar on other supported platforms.
Using the SC-P600
Software installation for drivers and additional software can be initiated via the install CD. This downloads the latest software, from the net, so is not the disk of driver software you may have used with printers in the past. Note that the CD itself only contains windows software – Mac software needs downloading.
Details, as ever, on the SC-P600 installation page.
Since I had it to hand, one of the first prints I made with the printer, was from my iPad.
It’s test image (in the sRGB colour space) that I’ve had for some time and use quite often for quick testing. It was in a Kodak test image kit I reviewed nearly 10 years ago.
I’ll start off with a print on plain paper – this goes in the main sheet feed at the rear of the printer.
With larger paper this takes up some space (move your mouse over the image to see), so you won’t be able to push the printer flush up against a wall.
I’m just using A4 size copier paper.
The screen allows me to set paper size and type at the printer. This may seem like extra trouble, but if you’re sharing a printer with other people, there is nothing quite so irritating as when someone prints out a word document, after you’ve loaded several sheets of expensive photo paper.
Even if you’re the only user of the printer, it’s all too easy to forget exactly what you’ve set if you load several sheets and the phone rings… (yes, I’ve done that).
The iPad finds the printer straight away – I’ve not configured anything at all on the iPad.
Moments later, the print starts to emerge.
I hadn’t selected borderless – this just happened to be the default. If you’re going to be printing from such devices, probably best to read a bit more in the on-line manual (clearly written and mostly helpful).
Here’s the print – PK (photo black) ink on plain paper was never going to be great.
A sheet of Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper (PGPP) looks pretty much spot on.
The screen only looks a lot more blue, because it’s working at a much higher colour temperture for its white point, than the halogen lighting in the room (6500K vs 2950K).
Changing the black ink to MK (matte black) allowed me to produce a print on Epson Archival Matte (lwr. left)
For long time Epson printer users, yes, I’m afraid you still have to swap black inks … more in a bit.
So, using Epson papers and the sRGB colour space I get perfectly acceptable prints straight from an iPad.
There is free print software available from Epson that I installed on my iPad and even my old iPhone 3GS – this lets you set up paper size and type. It works really well, even if I don’t much like using either device for any form of photography ;-)
For someone like myself who prints from Photoshop and goes to the trouble to make advanced colour profiles for papers, this bodes well for the printer.
Printing
I’m trying most of my printing via Photoshop (CS6), using custom printer ICC profiles to match the paper.
Epson supply some profiles for their papers, and they are very good – much better than ones you might have got 10 years ago, where there was much more variation in printer performance. This printer will undoubtedly be popular, so expect many paper suppliers to offer profiles, or even profiling services (if you buy their paper).
Papers tested and also profiled for ICC Colour and QTR B&W linerisation during this review.
- Epson Premium Glossy Photo (PGPP)
- Epson Archival Matte (EAM)
- Epson Cold Pressed Natural
- Epson Velvet Fine art (VFA)
- Innova IFA69 Fiba print Baryta – See review (paper is very similar to Ilford Galerie Silk)
- Olmec OLM70 Photo pearl premium – see new review for OLM 70, 71 and 72 (tested on the SC-P600)
- Olmec OLM71 Photo metallic gloss
- Olmec OLM72 Photo metallic lustre
I’ve got much more detail on profiling later, but you first need to print a ‘target’ with coloured patches, to make your profile for any particular paper.
In this instance I’m telling Photoshop to leave colour management to the printer and selecting ‘No Color Adjustment’ in the printer driver.
When printing with an ICC profile, I’ll select the profile in the Photoshop print dialogue. This deactivates the colour settings in the driver.
I’ll not show this in too much detail, since it varies depending on what software, operating system (and version) you are using. The manual has more details.
For black and white printing I’m using the B&W print mode (note how Photoshop is set to ‘Printer manages colors’ for this).
I’ll cover this B&W ‘ABW mode’ printing in more detail later, since it’s a very good way of producing monochrome prints.
You need to select your paper type here, and it needs to match the settings you’ve entered on the printer when loading paper.
You should also note that matte and art papers need MK ink, whilst PK black is for photo type papers (this for colour and B&W printing).
Note: On the Mac, I generally save sets of settings as ‘presets’ for different print setups. I find this reduces the chances of not getting the right settings for a particular print.
The ink type is listed after setting the paper. The printer will swap between the two, but bear in mind that it does use a small amount of ink, so it may be worth batching your print types if like me, you use a variety of papers.
The B&W mode has a number of settings, but the default Neutral/Darker setting is generally the most linear.
Indeed, if you find that you need to lighten it here, it’s a pretty good indicator that you are editing your images to make them too dark. 90% of the time this is because your monitor is too bright.
I’m testing the printer on another floor of my house, so although the exercise is good for me, I’ll often check the printer queue information, to check that printing has started, and the printer is on (it defaults to powering down after a few hours, and by default goes into ‘sleep’ mode after 3 minutes non use).
This is on my OSX 10.9 Mac, but similar options are available on any computer.
Eventually an ink cart runs low, so you will need to change it…
Changing ink on the SC-P600
Here is the printer’s display after I’d produced a lot of profiling charts and quite a few initial test prints, with a roughly even mix of colour and B&W prints.
The vivid light magenta hit the buffers first.
It first flagged low, and interrupted printing, offering me the chance to continue.
Unfortunately, I was upstairs and it aborted the print.
This was whilst I was testing with a pack of 5×7 glossy paper, making multiple prints, and it continued printing thereafter, so I got one half print in a pack of otherwise fine prints (you can see them later in the part about borderless printing).
I then decided to do two A3+ prints at 1440 dpi and 5760 dpi, to see if I could see any difference.
70% of the way through the print it stopped – it was serious this time, no carrying on.
I popped in a new cart – if you’ve got them nearby, this is a minute’s work at most.
The print carried on, but get the light reflecting on it from the right angle and you can see where the printing paused.
So, I’d say that from the first stop for ink change, to the ‘absolute must change’ stop, you can probably get another 2-3 A3+ prints – maybe…
Like all inkjet printers, the SC-P600 benefits from regular use – leaving any printer several weeks between prints makes it more likely that you will need to run cleaning cycles, especially if you live in a climate with low humidity or at altitude. If you really must leave your printer unused for extended periods of time, then consider sealing it in a big plastic bag, or perhaps get someone to pop in and print off a nozzle check on a sheet of plain paper?
Changing black inks
We’re well past having to physically swap ink carts to switch black inks, but the need is still there.
You can initiate the change from the control panel, or through the printer software (it can also be set to automatic, depending on paper type)
The first swap I made (from PK to MK) took just over 3 minutes, accompanied by lots of whirring noises from inside.
Swapping back only took about a minute and a half.
If you go into the printer’s utility and settings menu, there is an option to switch to a ‘reduced ink use’ black swap mode.
I’m not sure exactly what this does, but most likely doesn’t flush out the print head quite so vigorously. Thus your first print at the new setting may be at a reduced quality – whether this is noticeable is not something I’ve tested.
I note that this option is not settable anywhere in the printers web page or from the normal Epson printer utility (if it is – please let me know, I couldn’t find it).
Paper Loading and Media handling
The printer supports a very wide range of pre-defined print sizes, many including borderless printing.
Borderless printing is not something I use a lot, but it’s great to see real flexibility in paper size and the handling of print borders.
The photo below shows a pack of 5×7 sheets of Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper loaded into the sheet feed slot.
Apart from the ink running low, that I mentioned earlier, it took no effort to run off a whole pack of postcard sized prints.
You will likely lose a bit of print area off the edges, so do experiment with the two different borderless print modes on cheap paper first, particularly if you have text near the edge (once again see the printer manual for more details).
Thicker art papers
Thicker papers (and board) are loaded at the front. Here I’ve selected a thick art paper type.
I’m loading it via the front slot – there is loading information available on the display.
The rear paper support slot needs to be opened.
There is more information available if you just scroll down the display. Mouse over the image to see.
The front load tray pops out if you press it (note the guide on the screen).
Once you’ve loaded the sheet (printing side upwards), it’s drawn into the printer.
The paper will rise up out of the rear slot, so do make sure there is space, if it’s large paper.
You then need to push the loading tray back into the printer, before printing – ideally before you walk back upstairs to print ;-)
Large paper and custom sizes
The printer takes a wide range of custom paper sizes, as you can see from the setting screen below.
There are some limitations on paper types, but the setting above was for some custom greeting card paper I had.
You can also see how I forgot what way cards open up, when doing the artwork in Photoshop…
Of more direct interest to me is the ability to print on large sheets for panoramic images.
I’m using some 900mm paper, but the maximum (Win PC) is over 3 metres (129 inches or nearly 11 feet).
Here’s a 900mm sheet in the normal feed slot.
I’m trying a special panoramic paper size here from Paper Spectrum (based near where I live in Leicester in the UK).
Here’s a black and white print (using the ABW print mode).
The full size print – high resolution panoramic shots deserve to be printed large (my largest is over 14m long)
Here’s the print setup for a colour one. This is a paper very like Epson Archival Matte, so I’m using my EAM profile.
Here’s the final print (from a fall trip to Colorado). I’d normally use a lustre or semigloss paper for this image, to really bring out some of the colours.
Using Roll paper
The roll paper guides fit at the back of the printer. Note that the manual feed support is also opened, to accept the paper.
Unfortunately I was out of roll paper this size, so unable to test it. However, I did get to try this with our R3000 review a while ago, which discusses roll paper use with this size of printer in much more detail. Given the similarities between the R3000 and the SC-P600 I suspect differences would be negligible. For more tips about using the type of roll paper holder here, see my review of the SC-P400, which uses the same clip on units.
The printer can print to 129″ (3.27m) in banner mode – enough for most people’s panoramic print needs. I note that the maximum print length if you’re using a Mac is listed as only 1.3m – It’s the same for the P400, where I was able to make a 3.2 metre print, from a Mac
CD Printing
One of the software packages for the printer provides a complete design solution for CD Printing. It has hundreds of sample files, pictures and graphics elements to try.
Not all CDs/DVDs take ink the same way, so there are a range of options for setting print density and positioning.
The disk fits into the plastic tray. Note the rack at the side, which engages with an internal drive cog, to move the tray.
Paper size is set to CD.
The tray is loaded into the lighter grey front loading area.
Printing just worked, with no misfeeds or problems.
Printer testing
With any new printer I’ve a series of known test images that I always start off printing, I know what these images look like on different types of paper and many different printers.
It’s a quick way of seeing if the printer is up to more detailed testing, since if it can’t manage one of these images, it’s not going to suddenly look better with others.
I always suggest using such images when testing new papers, rather than your own favourite photos. If you can print an image you like the quality of, from these, then it makes refining the printing of your own work so much easier.
The images (and many others) are available for free download on this site.
Both images have lots of components to specifically test different aspects of printer performance.
I also use both for testing the performance of printer profiles. If you make use of them, then do be sure to read the explanatory notes that go with them.
Various Prints
I normally stick to just a few papers from the printer manufacturer, but this time I’ve included several other papers, such as a gloss metallic and a Fiber Baryta (IFA69) from Innova and a cotton rag paper that I believe is from Hahnemuhle. It’s the paper I looked at recently wrote up a detailed article covering its identification, testing and profiling for colour and black & white.
In the process of writing this review I’ve made many custom ICC profiles and ones for B&W use. These are listed at the bottom of the page and are available for personal, non commercial use on request.
I also tested three new papers (inc. two ‘metallic’ types) from Innova which I’ve included in their own short review (see review for OLM 70, 71 and 72).
The choice of what image works best with what sort of paper is a personal one. If I could come up with some decent guidelines, I’d have written them up a long time ago.
The two examples below are both on the cotton rag paper. The spider and wasp looks good, but the black on this matte paper just doesn’t give quite the depth I’d like (for this image), whilst if the church was printed on a glossy paper it might look too dark and harsh – it looks great on the cotton rag paper (printed using ABW and linearisation).
Note that this is a general observation on the suitability of different papers for different types of images.
Here are two more prints, both printed on an unusual metallic gloss paper (note the blueish reflection on the rear sheet in the feed tray). It actually has no optical brighteners in it and shows the smooth ink surface. There is still some gloss differential with the current inks, but no real bronzing on any paper I looked at.
Here are two borderless prints on fine art papers, loaded via the front slot.
The A4 one is on Epson VFA and the A3+ print on a textured watercolour type paper.
The display does warn of potentially reduced print quality at leading and trailing edges, but with flat paper, there was no problem at all.
Colour profiles and profiling
I prefer to create my own colour profiles for papers and printers I’m testing, using i1Profiler from X-rite and an i1iSis scanning spectrophotometer.
Note – if you are not that much into colour management, you really might want to skip over this section
To make a profile, I need to set the correct media type.
This isn’t too difficult for Epson papers, such as this EAM paper.
With other papers, look for the suggested settings from the manufacturer or supplier. If that fails, then go for something similar.
I’m printing both colour and B&W test targets for each paper.
This one is Velvet fine art – you won’t see much difference in these web images, but the VFA has deeper blacks and richer colours than the EAM above (note too the rear paper support, since the VFA was loaded through the front).
When using a new printer, check and re-check all your print settings.
The image below is from when I was building my colour ICC profiles in X-Rite’s i1Profiler. The red shape gives a feel for the gamut of Epson Cold Pressed Natural paper.
The only problem is that from profiling other papers, I’d expect the shape to be larger…
Well, it so happens that I’d accidentally set the printer driver to sRGB rather than ‘No Color Adjustment’ when printing the target.
Move your mouse over the image to see the results from when I printed the test target correctly.
You can see how the incorrect ‘sRGB’ one chops off the full range of colours that could be printed.
One of the uses of such a graphing tool is to spot obvious errors in your profiling process.
I don’t produce profiles commercially, so there just enough time between doing them that I have to be extra careful with the details.
The colour profiles I’m making have nearly 3000 patches on them, compared with the hundreds that most companies offering custom profiles use. If you do make use of any of the ones I’ve made, please let me know what you think. In particular whether you find using them with Perceptual or Relative Colorimetric rendering intent better (if you use RC, it should be used with BPC on matte papers). The two intents have distinct differences in my normal profiling setup, and work better for different types of image (YMMV).
Black and White
The B&W print mode of the driver gives very good results on many papers, but I know from experience that it often crunches up tones in the deepest shadows. Not much, but enough to show in my prints if I want to be able to show the difference between 100% black and 95% black.
I need to linearise the output. That’s what the step wedge pattern on my test image is for.
I’ll measure the 51 step wedge with my i1Pro2 spectrophotometer, although at a push, you could even use a good flatbed scanner, if you’re prepared to do a bit more experimentation.
I’m using the free ColorPort 2 software from X-Rite for the measurements.
It actually offers far more data than I need, but I’ve included some screen shots to show some more info about papers, since I know that a lot of people like to see it (don’t get too hung up on the numbers, is always my advice though ;-)
These are the readings for Epson PGPP paper at 100% black
By the way, there is far more about the process I’m using, in some articles specifically devoted to this aspect of profiling.
- BW linearisation with the i1Pro2
- Using i1 Profiler for measurements of B&W linearity
- Identifying and profiling a mystery fine art paper
I’m using the excellent QuadToneRIP package for producing my linearising profiles.
It’s actually designed for high quality B&W printing with Epson printers, so will likely be worth looking at for your B&W printing, particularly once the SC-P600 becomes more widely available, resulting in many more specialist QTR printing profiles.
QuadToneRIP – not yet supporting the SC-P600 at time of writing – it is regularly updated though.
I’ll also show some spectral data for measurements at 10% black. The first one is Innova’s IFA69 Baryta paper – a really nice finish, if you want to match some darkroom papers (I don’t remember them, but just really like its finish for B&W)
Note how the spectral response drops off in the violet, but has no obvious bump in the blue. This is typical of white Baryta papers with no significant optical brighteners.
Move your mouse over the image below to see the relatively flat curve from Epson’s Cold Pressed Natural paper. The gentle upwards slope is typical of a good cotton rag paper with a slightly warmer tone.
Both are really nice papers to use – choice should depend on the image and your personal tastes.
Printing with the correction profiles is simply via the normal ABW printing method.
The difference is simply that you apply the correction profile -before- printing.
Put your B&W image into a colour space such as sRGB and then convert to the QTR profile.
There should be no change to the look of the image. Now Assign the original profile (sRGB in this case) to the image.
Now the image should change. Move your mouse over the image below to see the effect.
The resulting image is lighter, reflecting the fact that the default print setting makes shadows a bit dark. I’m making my image lighter to counteract this. (if this isn’t clear, have a look at some of my other B&W printing articles).
For Epson VFA paper, here is the measured curve from the test target:
Here’s the correction curve from the created profile. You can see how it curves in the opposite way to the line of ‘L’s above.
The corrections are relatively minor and the ‘a’ and ‘b’ lines fairly smooth, all things that suggest that this is a good printer for B&W. Something borne out in actual prints.
And now a bonus graph for those who really like looking at the numbers… ;-)
I tried my ‘unknown’ smooth rag paper using both the ‘Normal’ and ‘Darker’ settings – Once again, I’d note that the default setting in the ABW driver is actually ‘Darker’ – mouse over the image to see the difference.
Just to finish off, here are the two curves from the correction profiles built from the data above.
Move your mouse over the image to see the change.
Note how both curves show how the ABW mode tends to block up deep shadows, whilst the ‘normal’ setting seems to apply a general ‘brightening’ curve to the whole image (needing the big opposite correction in the profile curve)
I’m inclined to wonder if Epson knows that an awful lot of people have their monitors set too bright and will find their print too dark, so allow for it in their ‘normal’ (but non default) setting?
Additional software
Epson Print Layout software is supplied with the printer. It works well and might be worth a look if you’re not printing from within Photoshop, Lightroom, or some other application that supports printing.
The Easy Photo Print software is the same as I looked at with the R3000, if you’re curious, see the details about Easy Photo Print in that review.
Also available is Epson’s Colorbase software for colour calibration (note that this is not a full ICC profiling package).
Conclusions: P600 review
At first glance the printer looks very much like the Epson R3000 I reviewed a few years ago, and I don’t doubt that if I pulled it apart there would be many design similarities.
The new tilt up touch screen is very useful for both setting up and general use when printing.
It reminded me of some of the frustrations I’ve had in that past with printers that didn’t have displays, yet alone ones in colour and touch sensitive. From a usability point of view it’s a definite step forward.
If there is a (minor) downside to this new display, it’s that it feels a little ‘plastic’ in its build quality. The shiny top cover at the front looks good, but is a fairly soft plastic, so prone to fine scratches.
The printer is advertised as having a new ink set with deeper blacks:
“Wide colour gamut and Epson’s highest black density (2.84 DMax on PGPP)”
The numbers when profiling do back this up somewhat, but it’s not going to be something that leaps out at you when looking at prints. Well, perhaps not unless they’ve been prepared specially and you’re at a trade show ;-)
I did note from profiling, that the new printheads of the SureColor range, and of course the software that drives them, seems to produce much more linear output straight from the start. It’s easy to see improvements of gamut when profiling, at the extremes, but real world images tend not to have huge amounts of such intense colours in them. What I noticed in the the SC-P600 output was a smoothness in tone over flat areas, with no obvious banding or awkward transitions. The speed that the vivid light magenta and other light inks were used up suggests that the stronger inks are used less than in some older printers. The 2pl minimum ink drop size will help too.
So, prints that use the PK ink can have a bit darker blacks – are you going to notice? I don’t blame Epson for trumpeting this number, but I’ve long believed that arguments over DMax numbers are best left to some on the forums, whilst others (myself included) go out and take photos.
This brings me back to the ‘problem’ I find with almost all new kit I’m reviewing these days. The days of massive leaps in performance with almost all new printer (and camera) models are behind us. To say that the SC-P600 is vastly better than the R3000 would imply that there were obvious deficiencies in the R3000, and as I remember it, it was a very nice printer to use.
If you’ve an older Epson printer from when you needed to swap black cartridges, the jump should be well worthwhile from a print quality point of view, particularly on more modern papers.
Paper handling
During all the time I used the printer I never had a single paper feed issue, and that’s with quite a range of papers.
There was no smudging of inks or signs of ink on the back of prints (usually from rollers). I’d suggest though for printers likely to be heavily used, you pay attention to the various cleaning options, especially if using papers that shed fibres.
The range of available paper sizes and availability of borderless printing, along with roll paper and custom paper sizes are very good, with no arbitrary limitations on media type.
Print resolution
The printer offers 1440 and a much higher 5760 dpi resolution.
Looking at prints normally, or even under a moderate magnifying glass really doesn’t show much difference to me.
I decided to print two versions of my B&W test print, but reduced in size to take the resolution of the files up to 1200 ppi
Here’s an actual pixel view of the ‘N’ of the Northlight logo – the shape is barely visible looking at the tiny prints. It’s printed using the ABW mode.
Getting out my USB microscope, here’s the view of the (greyscale) image printed at 1440 and 5760 dpi on a glossy paper.
Differences are there, but how much difference it will make to your prints, I leave as an exercise for the reader. Those with more spare time might like to resize to multiples of the ppi figures…
Ink costs
It’s very difficult to give ink usage figures from the testing I’ve done.
The pile of prints that (IIRC) precede the first ink change give but an introduction to working this out (remember that some ink is used during setup).
You can add in a small pile (5) of 5×7 colour prints, and maybe subtract 2-3 of the A3+ prints, but it gives a good feel for how much printing I did before the first cart (VLM) ran out (don’t forget a few black ink swaps too).
A full set of carts will set you back about £180
Epson do give figures for the number of ‘pages’ that you can expect from each cart, but do read the explanation of the methodology behind the figures.
Photo Black UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7601) | n/a |
Matte Black UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7608) | 1100 |
Light Black UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7607) | 10,000 |
Light Light Black UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7609) | 12,000 |
Cyan UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7602) | 2200 |
Light Cyan UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7605) | 2400 |
Vivid Magenta UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7603) | 1400 |
Vivid Light Magenta UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7606) | 2800 |
Yellow UltraChrome HD ink cartridge (T7604) | 2100 |
I’d note that if you do much black and white printing then these figures are -considerably- skewed.
When you get the printer, a full set of inks might be worth considering, but at currently over £20 a cartridge, it might be worthwhile noting how quick various inks go down for the mix of printing you do.
Black Ink
Oh, the elephant in the room…
There’s still there’s that need to swap black inks for paper type. I swap between paper types quite often and it’s disappointing to still see this ‘feature’ in Epson printers. Indeed, a few years ago when I used to have an Epson SP9600 44″ printer (with MK ink), I also had a SP7880 with PK loaded, just for work on lustre papers.
It uses a small amount of ink, that at current UK ink prices is going to cost you a few pounds per swap. I’m not sure why this is still needed. It suggests that some core aspects of print head design from the R3000 have not changed that much.
Speculation: With 8 inks you need 4 pairs of ink nozzle lines, if the nozzle sets come in pairs, then 9 inks would need 5 pairs, giving 10 ‘colours’ – one left over for another colour (orange? green?) or a gloss coat.
Cleaning, reliability and other bugbears
With all inkjet printers there is the question of clogging and ink used for cleaning – this is an area of shall we say… heated debate on some forums.
At no time during the month I had the printer did I see any indications of poor print quality. The printer arrived just before Christmas, so was left unused for over a week after setting up.
The printer has inks in carts that don’t move with the print head, so there needs to be a pressurisation system to ensure proper ink flow. It seems to work intermittently as needed.
It’s this that I suspect has been misinterpreted by some as ‘cleaning cycles’ during printing.
Printers need regular use – I’m convinced that a not insignificant portion of complaints about inkjet printers are ‘user related’. Printers are getting better, and things like the display on the SC-P600 certainly help, but buy a printer like this and only use it every two months, then (IMHO) you are asking for trouble.
The printer didn’t leave any marks on smooth paper surfaces that I could see.
I know that some printers show these marks much more readily (the R3000 I looked at had actually been damaged in transit). The SC-P600 has the ‘pizza wheel’ parts in the print output path, although I note a ‘fix’ for problems with such marks, that was sent to me concerning the R3000.
One other personal gripe is the occasional ‘Windows only’ features you see in the manual. The maximum print length on the Mac for example, is only ~1.3 metres (over 3 metres on the PC). Now, I’m sure that some of these limitations are not Epson’s doing, so why not say so ;-)
Will getting an SC-P600 massively improve your prints?
Of course not …The truth (IMHO) is, that many print problems I see are due to ‘user fixable’ issues.
So, a good colour managed workflow, good monitor calibration/profiling, paper choice and profiling, editing skills, and an appreciation of how best to handle aspects of sharpening. That’s before you even approach the content of the photos themselves…
If I had a perfectly good R3000 I’d not rush to update, but if I was perhaps printing from a smaller all-in-one style printer and wanted to really push my print quality, then the SC-P600 is an excellent way to go.
Sure, it’s producing slightly deeper blacks than before, but in reality you’re probably not going to notice without detailed comparisons.
The performance numbers are improved, but more than often it’s going to be the printer that will show the limits in yourwork, not vice versa.
The printer offers the chance to create stunning exhibition quality prints – if you have the pictures to match.
Overall
An easy to set up and use A3+ printer that produced excellent quality prints for colour and black & white. A wide range of paper size options, including roll paper, lets me simply print anything from small borderless postcards right up to wide panoramic images.
On second thoughts, that sounds almost too simple, but that’s what I want to see in a printer.
Summary
A pigment ink based A3+ printer that produces excellent black & white and colour prints.
Supports a range of media, including thick paper (to 1.3mm), roll paper and printable CDs.
Amazon.com SC-P600 (Epson C11CE21201) Wireless Color Photo Printer
SC-P600 at B&H
SC-P600 at Adorama
SC-P600 at Amazon.co.uk
SC-P600 at Wex (UK)
Specifications (from Epson)
Technology
Printing Method | Epson Micro Piezo print head |
Nozzle Configuration | 180 Nozzles Black, 180 Nozzles per Colour |
Minimum Droplet Size | 2 pl, With Variable-Sized Droplet Technology |
Ink Technology | UltraChrome HD |
Printing Resolution | 5,760 x 1,440 DPI |
Category | Consumer |
Printing Speed | 44 Seconds per 10 x 15 cm photo (Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper) 6 Pages/min Colour (plain paper 75 g/m2) 6 Pages/min Monochrome (plain paper 75 g/m2) |
Colours | Vivid Light Magenta, Vivid Magenta, Yellow, Light Cyan, Cyan, Matte Black, Photo Black, Light Light Black, Light Black |
Paper / Media Handling
Number of paper trays | 3 |
Paper Formats | A3+, A3, A4, A5, Letter, Letter Legal, Postcard, 9 x 13 cm, 10 x 15 cm, 13 x 18 cm, 13 x 20 cm, 20 x 25 cm, 100 x 148 mm, User defined |
Duplex | Manual |
Print Margin | 0 mm top, 0 mm right, 0 mm bottom, 0 mm left (Wherever margin is defined. Otherwise 3mm top, left, right, bottom.) |
Automatic Document Feeder | Standard (built-in) |
Compatible Paper Thickness | 0.08 mm – 1.3 mm |
Media Handling | Auto Sheet Feeder, Borderless print, CD/DVD print, Fine Art Paper Path, Roll Paper, Thick Media Support |
General
Energy Use | 0.3 Watt (Power off), 1.4 Watt (sleep mode), 20 Watt (printing) |
Supply Voltage | AC 220 V – 240 V,50 Hz – 60 Hz |
Product dimensions | 616 x 369 x 228 mm (Width x Depth x Height) |
Product weight | 15 kg |
Noise Level | 48.2 B (A) according to ISO 7779 pattern with Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper / Photo RPM mode |
Compatible Operating Systems | Mac OS X 10.6.8 or later, Microsoft Windows Vista (32/64 bit), Microsoft Windows XP (Home Edition / Prof / Prof X64 / Vista), Windows 7, Windows 7 x64, Windows 8 (32/64 bit), Windows 8.1, Windows 8.1 x64 Edition |
Included Software | Epson Easy Photo Print, Epson Print CD, EpsonNet Config, EpsonNet Print, EpsonNet setup |
Interfaces | WiFi, Ethernet, USB |
WLAN Security | WEP 64 Bit, WEP 128 Bit, WPA PSK (TKIP), WPA PSK (AES) |
Mobile and Cloud printing services | Epson Connect (iPrint), Apple AirPrint, Google Cloud Print |
What’s in the box | Driver and utilities (CD), Individual Ink Cartridges, Main unit, Power cable, Quick Setup Guide, Warranty Documents, WiFi/network setup guide |
Other Features
LCD screen | Type: Colour, Touch-panel, Diagonal: 6.8 cm |
Other
Warranty | 12 months Carry in |
-- --
Never miss a new article or review - Sign up for our Newsletter (2-4 a month max.)More print related information from Keith
...or use the search box at the top of any pageReference pages and test images
- Printer Test Images
- B&W printer test image
- Printer cleaning
- Paper reviews
- Printer info/news/speculation Canon | Epson
We're an Amazon.com affiliate, so receive payment if you buy via Amazon US
Davd Cg | Mar 1, 2020 at 8:29 pm
Cool, thanks saved me making an expensive mistake at the Photo show at the NEC, if the new models are that smaller I could accomadate an A2 model.
Keith | Mar 1, 2020 at 4:52 pm
Epson Japan released info last week – all the other parts of Epson have not as yet mentioned it, but both the P600 and P800 are getting updates this year. See here for whatever info I’ve been able to find http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-printer-news-updates-and-rumours/
I expect I’ll have some more formal info to pass on in March
David Cg | Mar 1, 2020 at 4:08 pm
Hi, the Surecolor P600 is about five years old now. Given product refresh cycles approx when would we expect a replacement from Epson for the P600? Would be upset to buy one now and a few months later a new model that doesn’t waste ink swapping blacks came out.
Keith | Jan 18, 2020 at 9:07 pm
Ah, my problem here is that personally I just wouldn’t ever print from LR (or C1) ;-)
Neither have true control over sharpening IMHO. Sharpening is just not something you ‘apply’ to a whole image. Now, I happen to make quite big prints, so I use photoshop for all my editing.
Unfortunately that means I can’t really help (there’s plenty about sharpening and printing here on the site, but it all assumes using software like Photoshop).
I’d suggest asking on the print forum somewhere like DPReview, since I know quite a few people do use LR (and C1) for smaller printers.
Dirk Offringa | Jan 18, 2020 at 8:18 pm
Hi Keith, I would like to have your opinion about output sharpening when printing on a SureColor P-series printer using thee Epson Print Layout utility. I used to print from Lightroom with the default sharpening settings and that worked pretty well on my P600. I changed from LR to CaptureOne, and the print module in C1 is just not OK for me. So I thought using the Epson Print Layout app from within C1. My question is: should I export from C1 to the Epson app and apply output sharpening, or does the Epson app take care of that? I have no clue here, and couldn’t find anything on the Epson website. Before wasting a lot of paper and ink I thought I’d ask if by chance you would be able to advise me here. Thanks many, Dirk
Naomi Jordan | Aug 2, 2019 at 12:02 pm
Hi Keith, thanks so much for the detailed review. It is so helpful to get proper information about the workings of the printer! Could I ask a question? I draw verses onto black card with white chalk markers and was wanting to reproduce copies of my work. Would this printer do the job? Obviously most of the paper would be black with the writing in white. I’m wondering if it would be cost effective?!
Nigel Puttick | Aug 2, 2019 at 12:03 pm
Hi – I discussed this issue in some detail at the Photo Show, to help me in my decision between Espson and Canon A3+ printers. Firstly I asked the specialist adviser at Epson – who said it was no longer an issue – and then with both Fotospeed and Permajet who confirmed that it seemed to have been solved with the printhead in the P600 and other recent Epsons, as they now have about 2 years experience of the later printers. They did however suggest that regular use was advisable, but that could be as little as a nozzle check every week, indeed one suggestion was to design a Christmas card, and print one every week! That would suit me well as I design and print my own Christmas cards, usually in a rush in November. I chose the Epson as the Canons all have the large border issue with heavier art papers, that has not been solved (even Canon admit is a problem).
Joanne Griffin | Aug 2, 2019 at 12:03 pm
Hi Keith
Your review has been so helpful to me purchasing the P600 so thank you!
I’m currently trying to print borderless onto A6 cards (A5 sized and scored) however Illustrator and InDesign keep adding a border. Do you have any tips on printing borderless on this size at all? Or is it only possible on certain sizes? I’m fine printing A4 borderless pieces.
Really appreciate all the work that goes into these posts, so thanks again. Joanne
tomherren | Jan 18, 2018 at 7:32 pm
Interesting! I admit I never tried the front loader. I will give it a try next time I have prints to do.
Steve | Jan 18, 2018 at 7:00 pm
Printing my SC-P600 through Photoshop CC
I have the same problem using the rear sheet feeder, but if I use the front loader all is dead centre!?
I am also running an old R1900 which center’s perfectly every time with exactly the same print processs….go figure!
Keith Cooper | Jan 17, 2018 at 11:53 am
Yes, the thickness limits in the specs are right. Not many papers I’ve got here (apart from board) needed the front feed. By ‘Thicker’ I was referring to the sorts of heavy papers that need loading a sheet at a time (front or back) and not using the autoloader. It’s a while since I had the printer here so I can’t remember exactly, but the guide via the screen is correct.
Steve | Jan 17, 2018 at 10:20 am
Hi Keith,
Thank you for the detailed review, I purchased the printer after reading it.
I am slightly confused by the term “Thicker Paper”.
If I am interpreting the User Guide correctly:
Rear Sheet Feeder = 0.7 mm to 1.3 mm (or Board)
Is this correct?
Regards
Steve
Keith Cooper | Jan 13, 2018 at 12:17 pm
It should be fine – you’ll have to use a sheet at a time. The printer specs says it can print on media up to 1.3mm – just be sure to check the settings and see that the paper has no obvious curl to it. Expect to lose a sheet or two to getting everything right.
Look at the example above with the Tortoise – that is on Epson VFA, but the smaller print is on a paper quite close to the one you mention.
Glad the review was of help!
Katrina Sophia | Jan 13, 2018 at 12:43 am
Hi Keith
Thank you for this brilliant detailed review, very helpful.
I am currently looking for a professional printer to print my watercolour illustrations and I am really liking the sound of Epson SC P600 – do you know if this printer will take 350gsm textured Hahnemuhle Museum Etching? I worry if 350gsm plus texture may too thick.
Thanks!
Keith Cooper | Oct 24, 2017 at 2:08 pm
The printer will give good service, but does benefit from regular use – this does a bit depend on where you are (we’re at sea level with no dry heat ever).
The black swap is irksome if you swap paper types a lot, but is no problem to do
The clock issue is something I’ve no experience of – I’d suggest looking at the DPReview and Luminous Landscape forums for comments about using the printer over a long term – I’m lucky to get some printers even for a few weeks to test, and they tend to be brand new.
George | Oct 24, 2017 at 12:56 pm
I’m replacing an HP Photosmart B8800, which finally bit the dust, and like what you have written about the P600, but I’m a little hesitant about whether the ink tends to dry in the nozzles, and the issue of swapping black inks. I shoot portraits, products, and landscapes, color and b&w. I like your blog, and am glad I stumbled across it.
john | May 3, 2017 at 2:28 pm
john how many many prints will the sc-p600 do be for its clock stops it from working .
Keith Cooper | Feb 9, 2017 at 10:39 am
see the contact us link – it’s on every page of the site
Kelvin Tjw | Feb 9, 2017 at 10:09 am
Hi Keith,
What’s your email address? I would like to request some ICC profiles from you. Thanks a lot.
Keith Cooper | Feb 7, 2017 at 2:36 pm
I’ve heard of this issue before, but am not sure of the fix – I’ve not got a similar printer here at the moment to test I’m afraid.
I’d suggest asking on the printer forum at Luminous Landscape or DPReview – mention whether you’re Mac/PC too as this might make a difference.
tomherren | Feb 7, 2017 at 2:21 pm
Hi Keith
I am printing with the SC P-600 from Photoshop CS5 and when I choose “centered image” in the print dialog, the upper border is always 1.5mm larger than the lower (or the border on the right compared to the left in upright format). Of course, this can be corrected manually, but I wonder whether I am doing something wrong.
thank you very much in advance
kacoooper | Dec 2, 2016 at 5:05 pm
I’d say the Epson gets round many of the issues I found with the PRO-100, and I certainly found it a nicer printer to use.
The only caveat I’d add is that the smaller PRO printers are showing their age – I’ve seen no signs of replacements at all yet, but given the quality of the PRO-1000 and 2000 I’ve looked at, I’d expect something in the next year or so?
fourfourfun | Dec 2, 2016 at 2:35 pm
Your in depths are fantastic. We’re in the position where we have a Pixma Pro 100 and 100S. They are great but there are the borderless issues (we do get some headstriking on heavy ink images on A4 plus the other inconsistencies you have on Canons such as restrictive paper sizes and the forced border on fine art, our bread and butter is cotton rag).
With the 100 starting to stop feeding, it is looking like upgrade time and this could be a viable option, especially as we tend to focus on art prints. Would you say the quality/robustness is up there with the 100, but also deals with our borderless issues we seem to be encountering.