Contact us: +44 116 291 9092
Title Image

Samyang 12mm f2.8 fisheye lens review

  |   Articles and reviews, Fisheye, Lens, Review, Rumour lens article, Samyang   |   3 Comments

Samyang (Rokinon) 12mm f2.8 fisheye lens review

A full frame 12mm fisheye lens with a stereographic projection geometry

Site update: Sorry for site slowness - the site has outgrown its hosting. Keith is working on this, but we are photographers not web developers!
...Get our Newsletter for new articles/reviews and why not subscribe to Keith's YouTube Channel
...Keith's book about how to use tilt/shift lenses is now available.
Our site contains affiliate links - these help support the site. See our Advertising policies for more

The Samyang (aka Rokinon) 12mm F2.8 ED AS NCS Fisheye lens gives a huge field of view, 180 degrees from corner to corner on a full frame (35mm) sensor.

Keith has been trying out the Canon EF version on a 50MP Canon 5Ds body. It was kindly loaned to us by Intro 2020, the UK distributers.

The Samyang fisheye lens is interesting in that it has a different geometric projection, compared to other fisheye lenses, such as the rather more expensive Canon EF8-15 Keith regularly uses – just what is the difference and why might the Samyang be a better choice for some photos?

side view Samyang 12mm

Buying the 12mm lens:
B&H | Adorama | |

The Fisheye lens

Fisheye lenses tend to be dismissed as ‘one trick ponies’ by a lot of photographers. I think this is unfair and reflects as much on the limited vision of -some- photographers, as it does on the actual lens type.

The Samyang 12mm f/2.8 ED AS IF NCS UMC Fisheye Lens (also available under the Rokinon brand) is a manual focus lens (with manual setting of aperture on Canon EF mount).  That said, the depth of field of a lens like this is huge, so it’s hardly difficult to use.

It’s available in a range of mount options: Canon EF, Nikon, Sony E, Pentax, Sony A, Canon EF-M, Fujifilm X, Samsung NX, Four-Thirds, and Micro Four Thirds (MFT). I’m testing the Canon EF mount version on a 50MP Canon 5Ds.

I used to have the Canon EF15mm f/2.8 fisheye, and a few years ago moved to the EF8-15mm f4L  zoom (review), so I regard having a lens like this as an essential part of being able to represent three dimensional spaces in meaningful and interesting ways.

samyang 12mm f/2.8

There are many technical reviews of this lens, with lots of charts and tables available. However, I’m primarily going to look at how you can use a lens like this, with a few technical notes along the way.

The lens comes with a removable lens hood, which given the 180 degree field of view from corner to corner, means that it’s more for protecting the front element against knock than keeping the sun off your lens.

From new, this hood feels quite stiff, and actually comes off more easily with the large lens cap fitted.

It loosens up, but to be honest, it rarely needs removing – the old EF15mm 2.8 fisheye had a fixed hood.

sy12mm f2.8 lens cap

The lens cap is made of solid feeling plastic – the whole lens has a well built feel to it.

sy12mm lens hood

Looking at the lens, with light from underneath, shows the aperture (here at f/5.6)

sy12 mm oblique view

An oblique view shows the natural vignetting caused from the angle of view.

side view Samyang 12mm

The aperture has half stop click detents from f/4 to f/22.

With the range of glasses in the lens, it’s worth noting that the focus scale is a bit temperature dependent, so if you are out at night photographing stars, you will need to ensure sharp focus at infinity, since the lens does not have a hard stop at the infinity mark.

The internal construction is shown, with aspheric optics and low dispersion glass (ED). The internal nano coating layer keeps down reflections.

samyang 12mm fisheye construction

Focus action is smooth, and as the scale on the lens suggests, if you go to f/8 you’ve a massive depth of field. At f/2.8 you need to be focusing on an object at under a metre to get softness in the far distance.

The lens has a solid metal mount, and at ~500g feels reassuringly well built (you do notice such things when swapping lenses around).

samyang 12mm ef lens mount

I’d note that red mounting dot would benefit from being duplicated on the side of the lens, making it easier to see in day to day use.

The lens comes well packed, and includes a soft padded bag.

samyang 12mm and box

The 12mm focal length

All fisheye lenses are not the same. There are a number of mathematical formulae that describe how the wide angle scene in front of you is mapped to the flat surface of the camera sensor.

Almost all other fisheye lenses are what is called an equidistant projection, the Samyang uses a stereographic projection.

This changes the apparent ‘distortion’ seen when using the lens, it also means that for my Canon lens, the focal length is ~15mm to get a field of view that is 180 degrees across the diagonal, whilst for the Samyang it’s only 12mm.

Look at these two photos taken across the road where I live.

First up with the Samyang 12mm

samyang 12mm full view

Now with the Canon EF8-15mm (set at ~14mm to match the horizontal view of the Samyang lens)

Canon 8-15 at 14mm

Note how the building seems to ‘bulge out’ more in the second shot, and how the buildings at the edges are more squashed up.

There are some more examples of the differences on the fisheye WP page

The stereographic projection of the Samyang lens is often more visually appealing and less obvious when you have people in the shot, such as this one (in a very poorly lit basement bar) taken by Karen when I was running an architectural pub quiz for local architects and students.

lrsa pub quiz

A bit of a crop and the curved ceiling and walls are not quite so obvious.

LRSA quiz

A closer shot, showing the quiz picture round, and the one permitted use of a mobile phone.

picture round

There are many ways of  changing the way images are shown, ranging from full rectilinear correction, which essentially transforms the image into that you’d get with a conventional ultra wide lens, through to different partial corrections that may produce images that you like.

I’ll look at some of the different photos I took with the lens and how I processed them later, but first a quick look at just how good the lens is.

Image quality

Using the photo taken of the houses across the street at several different aperture settings I noted that vignetting is slight, but noticeable in the corners at f/2.8, but essentially gone by f/4 and above.

That’s about as accurate as I’d really want to go since with a lens that covers 180 degrees of view from corner to corner, subjects that show up the vignetting are not going to be common.

If your RAW conversion software has profiles for the 12mm lens then they should fix this, although with no EXIF lens info, some software (such as DxO Optics Pro) won’t be able to do its tricks.

Even without profiles, the automatic chromatic aberration (CA) correction in ACR (photoshop CS6) did an excellent job of removing the colour fringes, whist a small about of defringing fixed residual colour.

Here are two screen shots (100% views) from the street view (at f/4) with and without CA correction.

edge CA

The CA looks quit obvious here, but remember that these are 100% crops from a 50MP sensor (default ACR sharpening).

The colour fringing on my much more expensive Canon 8-15mm is quite similar…

edge CA fixed

Although I’ve had the lens for a few weeks, the number of good clear days has been very few. I did nip out a couple of times to photograph some stars from outside of Leicester.

A first quarter moon and cloud are not helping (1 second f/2.8 3200 ISO) – you can see Venus shining through the cloud.

moon and venus

A 100 percent crop shows the Pleiades star cluster just above the moon


Hunting around a bit further and tweaking RAW settings a bit, I find the minor planet Vesta moving across the constellation Gemini (100% crop again)

(Finding Vesta S&T)


There is a bit of coma present in images towards the edges, and you’ll need to correct the CA, but images are very clear – if only I wasn’t in the UK’s 10th biggest city…

Fisheye lenses by their very nature, tend to exhibit less complex optical aberrations than rectilinear designs.

I also noticed just how easy it was to spot the constellations in the shots I took – there’s that stereographic projection again…

Using the Samyang 12mm fisheye

The photos here are all taken in the vicinity of my home and reflect a couple of trips out with just the Samyang 12mm – I find this the best way to force me to think about using the lens, and it also helps get over some of the ‘new toy effect’ where you can easily mistake ‘different’ for ‘better’. I’ve used fisheye lenses for several years, but I’m still not immune to the effect ;-)

I’ve used the excellent Fisheye Hemi software for some shots – it s a very simple plugin that is a key part of my image processing arsenal (see also Why I use Fisheye Hemi) I’ve also used the Photoshop Adaptive Wide Angle filter, although the fisheye settings are optimised for the usual type of fisheye, not the stereographic projection of the Samyang lens.

Just down the road I note how long a nearby street looks (actually ~200m)

misty street

The slight mist just adds to the feeling of distance. Note too how straight lines that run through the centre of the frame remain straight.

Applying Fisheye Hemi at the full frame setting corrects some of the verticals.

misty street FEH

A 100% crop gives a feel for the detail. I’m taking almost all of these outdoor shots at ~f/5.6.

Of course, I can’t be sure – there’s no EXIF data

misty street 100

Further down the street (on the sunny day this time) I get the sun in the frame to check for flare.

There are also bright reflections from the car and a window.

Using my hand to shield the lens from the sun, you can see the improved contrast, but there is no obvious flare that I can see

sun glare

sun shielded by hand

At the bottom of the street, I’m waiting to cross the road – with the depth of field, I’ve the lens set at infinity and exposure set manually to 1/320

huge depth of field

The camera is at my side, just being pointed towards the oncoming traffic.

A 100% crop shows the detail in the image.

huge depth of field 100

With the lens set at its shortest 20cm focus, close up objects look vast – in general, whenever I thought I was too close to something, I wasn’t.

Across the road I’m at the river, going along the tow path.

canal view

If you want to process image like this to get rid of the curvature for verticals, it’s a lot easier if you keep the horizon level, through the centre of the image.

Of course, the ‘distortion’ is not always so obvious, such as going under a bridge.

under mill lane bridge

Or it might not matter – this swan is only a foot or so from the camera (focus set at ~ 1 metre)

curious swan

The building behind the swan is the new Vijay Patel building at De Montfort University (we have two in the city, I went to the other older one)

Sometimes with such wide angle shots much more than the basic composition is down to luck.

feeding time

Heading back to the new university buildings, I take this shot from the bridge I was under, in the earlier shot.

bridge view

Here’s the photo after applying Fisheye Hemi (full frame setting). This is a modified cylindrical projection

bridge view feh

And here’s a fully ‘defished’ version, as you’d get with a very wide rectilinear lens. Note the stretching of the road sign and considerable cropping.

bridge view rectilinear

Moving along, I get this shot of the new cafe.


It’s the sort of shot that designers like, but architects hate (I do work for both).

My normal choice for a building like this would be to get out my 17mm tilt/shift lens and tripod, but I’ve neither with me.

Making use of the curves of the building may work, but take care where strong lines intersect the frame.

building curves

Watch for your own reflection too…

At the side of the building is a new gallery

the gallery outside

Inside is an exhibit of a self playing piano.

Two views of this interesting space – one is as shot and one has had some correction for verticals applied.

Do you prefer one over the other?

gallery uncorrected

gallery corrected

Walking out of the gallery into the foyer of the Vijay Patel building, there is a great sense of space, with the multiple free flying staircases.

vp entrance

People can anchor the image and give a sense of scale.

That said, just the geometry of the structure can be of interest.

In this image (uncorrected). I’ve cropped off the bottom of the shot (big close-up steps), so that the symmetry of the shot gradually breaks as you go upwards.


In this shot, I’ve corrected verticals by applying the Fisheye Hemi plugin.

feh crop 3 times

As in all of these shots, once you are working at such wide angles and potentially correcting geometry later, it pays to take several shots. Relatively slight movements of the camera and where you’re pointing it can have a huge effect on the results.

Observations and conclusions

From an image quality point of view I’ve very little to quibble about. The lens is robustly constructed and the addition of the padded bag for it most welcome.

The f/2.8 lens gives a nice bright image in my viewfinder, although manually stopping the lens down and not having any aperture information (Canon EF) may cause some difficulties if you are not used to manual lenses.

Going to f/5.6 was enough to sharpen up the edges of the frame a bit, and gives me so much depth of field that the only reason to check the focus settings was to make sure I’d not nudged the focus when changing aperture or vice versa.

From my own point of view, learning to trust manual exposure and setting apertures and focus can do nothing but improve your understanding of what’s going on and your appreciation of light.

If you really must work on auto settings then setting a shutter speed and aperture, along with auto ISO may be of help.

I’m only testing this lens here with a full frame DSLR camera where the 180 degree field of view gives the lens its distinctive look. I’d suggest that with a crop sensor camera you’d be better off with a shorter focal length lens.

Here are the different specs for different mount options.

samyang 12mm f2.8 mount options


The Samyang lens is subtly but distinctly different in how it represents the field of view to most fisheye lenses.

lens reflection samyang 12mm fisheye

This makes for ‘out of the camera’ shots that are more generally pleasing, but combined with the lack of EXIF information does mean you need to take a bit more care in how you choose and use any de-fishing or other correction software.

Flare and other aberrations are well controlled – If you want the numbers then I’m afraid you’ll need to search elsewhere, since I’ve really been looking at the lens from a what can you do with it POV.

It’s different enough that I may well consider it in addition to my EF8-15mm.

Definitely not the one-trick-pony some might dismiss it as…

Buying the 12mm lens:
B&H | Adorama | |

Lens details

Lens type Prime lens
Max Format size 35mm FF
Focal length 12mm
Image stabilization No
Lens mount Canon EF, Nikon F (FX), Pentax KAF2, Sony/Minolta Alpha, Sony E
Maximum aperture F2.8
Minimum aperture F22
Aperture ring Yes
Number of diaphragm blades 7
Aperture notes Circular blades
Elements 12
Groups 8
Special elements / coatings 2 aspherical, 3 ED, nano coating system
Minimum focus 0.20m (7.87″)
Autofocus No
Full time manual Yes
Focus method Internal
Distance scale Yes
Weight 515g (1.14lb)
Diameter 77mm (3.04″)
Length 73mm (2.86″)
Sealing No
Colour Black
Hood supplied Yes
Tripod collar No

Never miss a new article or review - Sign up for our Newsletter (2-4 a month max.)

More lens use related articles

All articles and reviews are listed on our main Articles and Reviews page, or use the search box at the top of any page. Experimental items, hacks and how-to articles are all listed in the Photo-hacks category.
Some articles that may be of interest:  

More of Keith's articles/reviews (Google's picks to match this page)

We're an affiliate, so receive payment if you buy via Amazon US

  • Evgeny Reider | Aug 2, 2019 at 12:31 pm

    Thank you for the wonderful article. I purchased now in B&H this lens, but have a problem with a lens sharpness… I was told that i have calibrate this lens before, but I haven’t no idea how to do it… Could you help me, please? thank you in advance.

  • te6 | Aug 2, 2019 at 12:01 pm

    thanks for nice review.So if i have 5D3 and now Sigma 15 fisheye,and need to move (just to take 360 photos),would what be better C8-15 or this one ? difference is almost 1000Euro between them :-X on Canon i will use only 12mm.Thanks

  • yopyop | Feb 15, 2017 at 3:32 pm

    Thank you for this review, especially for pointing out the stereographic projection geometry.

Post A Comment