Contact us: +44 116 291 9092
Title Image

Adobe Camera Raw DNG profiles from a ColorChecker card

  |   Article, Articles and reviews, Camera testing, Colour management, Image Editing, Lighting, X-Rite   |   2 Comments

Adobe Camera Raw DNG profiles from a ColorChecker card

ACR DNG profiles for RAW processing

Site update: Sorry for site slowness - the site has outgrown its hosting. Keith is working on this, but we are photographers not web developers!
...Get our Newsletter for new articles/reviews and why not subscribe to Keith's YouTube Channel
...Keith's book about how to use tilt/shift lenses is now available.
Our site contains affiliate links - these help support the site. See our Advertising policies for more

DNG Camera profiling, or customising the camera colour response when converting RAW files using Adobe Camera Raw (also works for Lightroom).

These techniques are applicable to -any- camera that ACR can work with.

Although the Ricoh GX200 is used as an example, we use this DNG profiles for some lighting setups with our Canon 1Ds Mk3 and 5Ds.

Colorchecker card for profiling

Making Profiles

Keith recently reviewed the Ricoh GX200 and was impressed by the fact that it used DNG as the format for its RAW files. Unfortunately there is no Ricoh software to process the RAW camera files on Apple Macs, which we use.

Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) supports processing these files, but has no built in profiles, so relies on the camera info in the DNG file.

This short article shows how you can use the DNG profile editor and now build camera profiles for ACR with a ColorChecker card. It covers general purpose profiling and making an example specialist profile for working with poor quality lighting (profiles downloadable).

Update notes: A different software package to create the profiles is now available (for free) from X-rite with the Colorchecker Passport. This is very easy to use. For full ICC camera profiles, the ColorChecker SG card can be used, although the functionality to create such profiles (Camera profiling) was dropped when i1Profiler appeared. i1Profiler does support scanner profiling and people have used it to make camera profiles, but it’s a bit of a hack.

Digital Camera colour management

When it comes to ICC colour management for printers and monitors there is no question about the benefits offered — but input devices such as cameras are more problematic. I’ve covered some of the issues in scanner profiling in another article, but camera profiling and its effectiveness is a much more contentious issue. Most of the time I’m happy to use the supplied profiles in RAW image conversion software, if my camera is a supported one.

Even though I can process RAW files from a GX200 perfectly well with Adobe Camera Raw, there are no ACR ‘built in’ profiles for this camera.

Some RAW processors allow you to use ICC camera profiles – DxO Optics Pro for example, supports the building and use of ICC colour profiles for cameras. Unfortunately it doesn’t support the GX200, so I couldn’t try that route.

I looked at using the ColorChecker SG card for camera profiling a while ago. The ColorChecker card and software are designed to produce full ICC camera profiles (for converters that support them).

Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) does allow for some considerable degree of adjustment of its colour handling and there have for some time been scripts available that allows you to perform a ‘calibration’ process using photographs of such cards.

Profiles for Adobe Camera Raw (ACR)

In the design of ACR, Adobe has gone for a different profiling process, not using ICC style profiles. Until recently this was a closed system, not available for us to tinker with.

The script based adjustments mentioned above, only augment the existing ‘profiles’.

DNG profile editor softwareIf you have ACR 4.5/6 (PS CS3) or ACR 5.x (PS CS4) then you can download a test version of some new camera profiles and an application called DNG Profile Editor.

Note. If you have an older version of ACR then you can still use the ACR profiling scripts mentioned on the CC SG review page – they are not quite so easy to use and probably not as flexible, but at least you won’t have to buy a newer copy of Photoshop.

There is some very good documentation and tutorials on the Adobe site, so I’m not going to go into great detail about how to use the software.

The process of making a camera profile is: (this on a Mac – Win PC is similar)

  • If you’ve not got it, Download Camera Raw 4.6 from (note that this won’t work with versions of Photoshop before CS3)
    Mount the disk image and drag the file ‘Camera Raw.plugin’ to:
    /Library/Application Support/Adobe/Plug-Ins/CS3/File Formats/
  • Download Beta Camera Profiles from and run the installer.
  • Download DNG Profile Editor from and unzip.
    Drag it to your Applications folder.
  • If you were trying this for a camera that doesn’t produce DNG files then you should:
    • Launch Photoshop and open the RAW file of your ColorChecker target.
      In ACR, click Save Image… Choose DNG as the file format and save it.
  • Launch DNG Profile Editor.
  • From File>Open select your DNG File.
  • Choose the DNG file you want to work with.
  • You can white balance the image by right clicking on the second grey square.
  • Select the chart tab in DNG Profile Editor.
  • Move the coloured circles to the centre of the matching coloured corner square in your RAW file.
  • Click ‘Create Colour Table’.
  • Choose File/Export <Camera> profile… Give it a meaningful name and save it.
  • Exit DNG Profile Editor.
  • Quit and re-launch Photoshop and open a RAW file. In Camera Raw, on the calibration tab, you should now see the profile you just saved as an option.

Buying a Card

We make a specific point of not selling hardware, but if you found the review of help, please consider buying your card, or any other items at all, via our link with Amazon.
Amazon Fr / Amazon De
Amazon USA link / Amazon Canada link

It won’t cost any more (nor less we’re afraid) but will contribute towards the running costs of our site. Color card

That’s the basic version and it just works…

The measurement process and much more, is explained in the DNG Editor tutorial.

A refinement is that Adobe ACR profiles are built from two sets of measurements, one at 2850K and one at 6500K. You can produce similar profiles by taking two shots of your card – one illuminated with Tungsten lighting and one in daylight.

ACR profile for the GX200

I took several photos of a standard ColorChecker card, outdoors in sunlight and indoors under a halogen ceiling light (the sort with a built in reflector).

Actually, as you can see in some of the images below, I took loads of pictures…

I also took some photos of the card in my hallway, which is lit with an energy saving light bulb.

I hate these bulbs, from a lighting point of view – they mess up colours a treat. In fact when I’m doing interior photography of somewhere like a hotel, I take a box of ‘ordinary’ light bulbs of different sizes with me, to temporarily replace them.

I’ve a number of screen shots showing different aspects of the process outlined above. I’ve some observations on the process and some things to watch out for in the conclusions afterwards.

In this first picture, I’ve two (RAW) photos of the target opened up. One is at a white balance setting of 5200/2 and the other 3000/5

profiling target image

The small circles are the target identifier marks that you move to the corner patches.

Although not recommended, you can have the target taking up a smaller part of the image.

I also have a specialist white balance ‘grey card’ in the picture (see my review of using it for more info)

tilted profiling target

If you are using two images to get a better general purpose profile, then each image contributes to one table in the profile (tables contain the ‘correction’ information for the profile)

Here’s where I’ve told the software that this image is for the 6500K table.

building profile tables

And here, the 2850K table.

dual tables for camera profiling

Note that the software is smart enough to allow for the fact that your images were not shot at exactly 6500/2850.

The profile is generated in a few seconds, and can be exported.

Note. You will need to restart Photoshop to use it.

exporting camera profile

For a specialist profile like the one below, you can use just one image.

Here’s a target lit by an energy saving light (ESL) bulb – the camera thinks a WB of 3200/19 is OK, but right clicking on the second grey (from the left) gives a value of 2550/17.

building specialist camera profile

I’ve created this profile (ESL) from just this one shot.


Do note that all the images here are what you are seeing in a web browser – colour is notoriously difficult to get right on the web – also, these are JPEG images, and although I’ve saved them at high quality, the compression process doesn’t take highly saturated colours too well.

Remember too that a pleasing picture is not automatically the most colorimetrically accurate picture, hence the slightly more saturated colours in the ACR ‘Standard’ profile for the GX200.

Using the new profile for the GX200 gives slightly richer and slightly more contrasty images. I’d have been concerned if there had been much difference, since that would indicate that Ricoh had inaccurate camera data in the DNG file.

I tried to come up with a web example that would show the difference using the new ‘Standard’ profile, but given the problems I mentioned earlier, I decided that it would be far better to show the differences using the custom ESL profile.

The first image shows the default or ’embedded’ DNG profile.

If you move your mouse over the image you can see the ‘standard’ profile I made from the two pictures of the target.

The second picture shows the difference between the embedded and custom ESL profile.

The picture shows some of the 120 year old floor tiles in one of the corridors of my home (I only have ESL bulbs in bits of the house I don’t spend much time in ;-) – yes they could do with a proper clean… it’s on the list!

Original ImageHover Image

The ESL profile handles this lighting well, while the ‘standard’ is slightly better than the ’embedded’

Original ImageHover Image

The whole profile making process works fine for me – I’ll be taking the ColorChecker card with me next time I’m shooting (with a Canon 1Ds Mk3) in unusual lighting.

I’ve found that ‘proper’ icc camera profiles can be of use in well defined lighting setups, but the ACR profiling certainly seems to be happier handling situations where there is some variation in basic lighting.

What about using the wider ranging ColorChecker card SG for making even better profiles? The colours are not quite the same in the patches that duplicate the original ColorChecker card and at the moment, Adobe’s software only supports the original.

The example below is from the ColorChecker SG – i1 camera profiling review I wrote a while ago and shows a benefit of camera profiling under fluorescent lighting.

benefit of camera profiling with fluorescent lighting

Adobe have this to say in their DNG Profiles FAQ, about the profile editor (PE)

  • Can the Chart Wizard be used with other charts such as the ColorChecker DC or ColorChecker SG?
  • No. PE currently only supports the 24-patch ColorChecker Chart.
  • The ColorChecker SG contains a block of patches similar to the 24-patch ColorChecker Chart, but they have different spectral reflectance values and hence should not be used with PE.

If you want to check profile accuracy then there are some useful scripts that work with different types of card, listed below.

Do be careful with the lighting of your card.

Although the sun is out, the card below is pointing to the sky in the North East. The colour temperature is a cool 7050K, and with a tree nearby which could easily affect some colours.

profile target illumination

Try and light your card evenly with the light (sun) off to one side and in the case of studio/home lighting, far enough away so that the card is evenly illuminated.

Watch out too for reflections from nearby brightly coloured objects – our eyesight effortlessly adjusts for this sort of effect, so it’s very difficult to see.

Using ACR DNG Profiles

If you’d like to try the basic GX200 files then…

Download Keith’s GX200 ACR DNG profiles (zip file) – ‘Standard’ and ‘ESL Bulb’

Where to put them

  • Mac OS X: /Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles
  • Win 2000/XP:
    C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles
  • Windows Vista: C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles

Restart Photoshop and when you next open an appropriate image, the new profiles will appear as choices in the ACR Camera Calibration section.

Here it is for the GX200 profiles (if you want to use ones for other cameras that are already supported, then look at building your profiles on top of existing ‘base profiles’ – see more Adobe info)

If you’d like to experiment, I also have the two base recipes that were used to make the profiles available for download. You could use them to fine tune profiles based on my measurement data. One file is based on two measurements and the ESL one on just one. Please do let me know if you find them of use?

using ACR DNG rprofiles


Quick and relatively easy to use.

Works very well in more unusual lighting conditions.

DNG profiles offer a way of improving the RAW conversions for a camera like the GX200 (full GX200 camera review), and can be applied to any raw files openable by ACR.

Unfortunately only usable with the latest versions of Photoshop.

A different software package to create the profiles is now available (for free) from X-rite with the Colorchecker Passport

Never miss a new article or review - Sign up for our Newsletter (2-4 a month max.)

More colour management and printing related information

For information about printers, paper reviews and profiling (colour management) see the Printing section of the main printers and printing page, or use the search box at the top of any page.
All colour management articles and reviews are indexed on the main Colour Management page - please do let Keith know if you've any questions, either via the comments or just email us?

Some specific articles that may be of interest:  

  • Why don't my prints match my screen? A short article showing why there is more to getting your prints to match your screen, than just calibrating your monitor. It's the vital first step, but you do need to consider some other factors for best results.
  • Why are my prints too dark - some basic suggestions to this common problem.

Articles below by Keith (Google's picks for matching this page)

We're an affiliate, so receive payment if you buy via Amazon US

  • Keith | Nov 5, 2020 at 9:20 am

    I’m glad one of my older articles was still of use!
    One good reason not to lose older content on a site ;-)

  • Roger Breton | Nov 5, 2020 at 12:01 am

    Thank you so much for taking the time to explain. I am trying to help a friend who shoots RAW with his Canon digital camera and he wasn’t all that successful using CaptureOne. I suggested he’d give a try to CameraRAW. He galdly sent me some RAW shots where he has the ColorChecker included in the photo. At first, I did not know how to get rid of “profiles”? In the older CameraRAW versions, we did not have to worry about any possible color management added by the software on top of “developping” the RAW file. I’m using version 13.0.2 on Windows 10. Following in your footsteps, I was able to make a “New” Preset where I did not use any “Table”. The resulting ICC profile, made using i1Profiler, was much better :-)

Post A Comment