Paper review: Innova Cold Press Rough Textured Natural White
Innova Cold Press Rough Textured Natural White
Innova IFA-13 – a short paper review
...Get our Newsletter for new articles/reviews and why not subscribe to Keith's YouTube Channel
...Keith's book about how to use tilt/shift lenses is now available.
Our site contains affiliate links - these help support the site. See our Advertising policies for more
We regularly use several Innova papers for some of our large black and white and colour prints.
Choice of paper can have a big impact on how an image feels – one of the more important choices I make in the final presentation of my own work.
I often choose smooth surface papers, or those with a slight texture, such as the IFA-24, 25 I recently looked at.
During our recent testing of different papers for the new iPF8300 we’ve got at Northlight, Innova asked if I’d like to try a much heavier textured paper.
The paper is Innova IFA-13 Cold Press Rough Textured Natural White.
About the paper
The paper is quite stiff, and at 520 micron thickness, noticeably thicker than many other papers of similar weight.
This from Innova:
“Fourdrinier Acid Free Paper Museum quality
Innova rough-textured, has a natural white finish with a coarse structured surface equivalent to a traditional watercolour paper designed for high quality fine art & photographic reproduction and print applications with inkjet (giclée) technology. It is an acid free, single side coated media It is an archival quality paper with great colour gamut and accuracy.”
Right – Texture compared to thin plain paper wrapping on the roll we tested.
The photo emphasises the texture more than you’d notice in normal lighting.
Key features are listed as:
- Fourdrinier inkjet art paper
- Natural White
- Heavily textured ‘Cold Press’ surface
- Opti-coat precision coated
- Archival – Acid & lignin free
- Instant dry
- Pigment & dye ink compatible
- Excellent colour gamut for colour photography
- Exceptional Dmax
|Note: figures are from Innova specification sheets||IFA-13|
It’s available in a variety of sizes:
I decided to test it on the Canon iPF8300 for both colour and black and white performance.
The paper was the thickest yet I’ve tried in the 8300, and it had no difficulty in handling the 520 micron paper from a 36″ roll.
The suggested media setting is Fine Art textured (for the Canon iPF x300 range), so I proceeded to create a custom media configuration for the paper, followed by a test target for creating a profile.
Here’s a portion of the test target – look carefully and you can see some slight mottling in the darker areas of some colours.
Here’s a detail, showing the mottling, and more seriously, some bleed from high ink areas.
I should have been quicker to spot this, but papers I’d been looking at of late all handled well at the suggested settings.
I should too have remembered the Media settings article I wrote some time ago on the importance of checking media settings…
The media tool for the x300 printers offers hints based on Weight (gsm) or Thickness.
You can also print out test patterns to compare different ink limits.
Eventually, after quite a few tests I settled on a media setting based on Premium Matte Paper and the ‘Low’ ink limit setting.
This produced much less visible mottling and no bleed with the test targets.
I also discovered that the 520 micron paper was not good at going through my iSis spectrophotometer, so it was back to good old manual scanning with an i1 Pro (the roll paper would not lay flat on an i1 iO scan table)
Having a new printer and a big sample of paper to test is a great way to discover any foibles in profiling or printing, at a time you are not in a hurry to get a job out of the door.
I’ve not tried this paper on any other large printers, but considering the similarities I’m seeing between the smooth IFA-11 on both Epson and Canon printers, I’d suspect that similar care in media selection would be required on say, an Epson 9890 or 9900.
The results from test prints with a good colour test image, showed that although the lower ink limits might reduce the overall gamut somewhat, the paper was capable of getting good deep colours on our 8300.
- We have a number of downloadable test images available for colour and monochrome. I always find it best to evaluate a new medium with a known image -before- working with your own images.
The paper is easily stiff enough for a roll print to comfortably stand on its end.
The 34″ square print of Fall colours in the Cascades works well.
When creating the print file I took care to very specific in applying sharpening.
I restricted it to a few specific areas of the image and leaving the background to be further softened through the texture of the paper.
This was even more important with the image of a few Aspen leaves below, where perceptions of print sharpness can come from just one or two key areas.
The paper is a warm white, without any optical brighteners.
Whilst the roll paper is great for flexibility in print sizes (and shipping), I’d probably prefer to print on sheet paper, if the job allowed it.
The paper showed a few unusual features during profiling, that meant I had to be much more careful over ink limits (the maximum amounts of ink put down) than with other Innova papers I’ve tested.
The paper is quite stiff and thick, but showed no problems in the curved roll feed print path of the iPF8300.
The texture is very pronounced for this paper, and as such I’d personally have difficulty in selecting images that would look best on it, as opposed to my normal (warmer matte paper) preference for the smooth cotton natural white (IFA-11) or soft textured natural white (IFA-12)
For black and white images, the depth of blacks was similar to the other Innova papers I use, with the exception of the slight mottling of the surface if you put down too much ink.
This makes deep blacks look not quite as deep as they might seem from measurements, and appears to come from the dips and bumps in the surface acting almost like two slightly different paper surfaces.
For the data hungry, I measured the deepest blacks around Dmax 1.56 – typical for this sort of paper.
This is where the collections of numbers and graphs that you see with some reviews just fall down.
The whole essence of this paper -is- its texture, which either works or not for a particular image based on your own tastes.
As you can see to the right, in a more directly lit shot, the texture is more of semi-regular dimples, on a scale of a few millimetres.
I’m still looking for the image of mine that really yells out a need for printing on this paper.
At Northlight we don’t do art reproduction, where I can see that watercolours might fit well with this paper. If you do try it out I’d appreciate hearing what you feel works best?
Looking at this paper actually made me think more about how surface texture worked for my own photos.
If you get the chance to try some samples, don’t pass by the heavier papers with a richer surface – it might be just what your image needs.
The paper is available from Innova distributors worldwide.
Innova have more technical details (and profiles) available on the Innova web site.
- Note: We couldn’t mention this at the time the review was originally published, but we used X-Rite’s new i1 Profiler for creating our printer profiles – there is more info about this in our i1 Profiler printer profiling review
Article History – First published January 2011
Never miss a new article or review - Sign up for our Newsletter (2-4 a month max.)
Enjoyed this article?
More print related information
For information about other printers, paper reviews and profiling (colour management) see the Printing section of the main Articles and Reviews page, or use the search box at the top of any page. There are also specific index pages for any articles connected with the following topics:
- Digital Black and White
- Tutorials and 'How to' articles
- Colour Management
- Printer test images
- Why do your prints look wrong?
More of Keith's articles/reviews (Google's picks to match this page)
We're an Amazon.com affiliate, so receive payment if you buy via Amazon US