Epson Traditional Photo PaperThe UK brand name for what is Epson Exhibition Fiber Paper in the USWe've recently reviewed the excellent Epson 4880 A2+ printer, and when it was supplied by Epson UK (thanks) they also sent a pack of what is called Epson Traditional Photo Paper here in the UK, but might more commonly be known as Epson Exhibition Fiber Paper in US reviews, where it has drawn a lot of comment. This short review covers the paper and offers a few suggestions about geting the best out of it.
About the paperThere isn't a great deal on the Epson UK site about this paper, and several paper suppliers I visited had not actually ever seen any. Here's an A3+ (13"x19") box of the paper with the 4880 I recently reviewed.
The 'fact sheet' for the paper has this to say:
It's one of the new generation of heavy 'fibre' papers that has a finish not dissimilar to an air dried “F” surface darkroom paper (no, I don't remember it, I'm going on what some older people told me ;-) It's a wood pulp based paper and does contain optical brightening agents (OBAs). This may or may not be a problem for you (for archival purposes) The specs from Epson (US)
Suffice to say, it is a very white paper, made all the more noticeable when you open the box and find that it is shipped in a black plastic bag (just like darkroom papers) The cynic in me might see this as a cunning marketing ploy to make people comfortable with darkroom printing, just that little less wary of digital ;-) It's a heavy paper, on a par with the Ultrasmooth Fine Art Paper I like using for some of my black and white prints with my Epson 9600 (Matte [Mk] ink), although it's thickness is only slightly more than Premium Luster. US Prices (from Epson) range from $59/25 for A4 to $379/25 for 20"x30. The paper is only available in cut sheets. Using icc profilesTo get the best results, you normally need custom printer profiles made, however a group in the US has made some excellent profiles available for this paper. Printers supported include:
Finding the correct printer settings was a bit of a search on the Epson site, however this description is from the profiles site
Print QualityI printed a variety of images on an Epson 4880, both colour and black and white.
It's very difficult to give a feel for a paper in a web review, but the picture above gives an impression of the richer black in the TPP print (A3+) to the right, compared with the same image printed (A3) using the Epson ABW mode on Premium Luster paper to the left. This may or may not make some images look better - deciding this is very much a matter of taste. It actually took me several prints to get good results. First of all, the flakes... Inside the pack of paper were lots of small white flakes of surface coating. The picture below has had the brightness of the black bag bumped up to show the flakes
Out came my trusty feather duster - this is excellent for cleaning the surface of papers that shed fibres or flakes.
The sheet below shows what happens if you are not thorough enough. When the print is dry, flakes come off leaving white specks. Since I've no desire to go back to the darkroom practice of 'spotting' prints, this was a dud...
Next there is the issue of raising the platten height for the printer
This was before I set it to 'W' and shows a head strike ... another dud :-( OK, it's fine for me to mess around with settings, but this isn't a cheap paper, so a bit more info and guidance would have been nice. The prints do look excellent with not too much difference in gloss between the paper and inked areas (any slight colours in the reflection are due to the halogen ceiling lights used to get the reflection)
...and not much gloss 'gaps' showing up in highlights (the print below is the one of the drummer above)
The paper surface is relatively fragile so be careful in taking sheets out of the box, and be careful stacking sheets (I use thin tissue paper, after prints have dried). The image below printed with tremendous depth in the bits of mountain poking through the cloud.
SummaryRemember that paper choices are a very personal thing, so always go for a sample and see how you 'feel' about the print quality. This is something very important for my big prints and varies with subject matter, print size and where the prints are destined to hang. The quality is excellent, with deep rich colours and blacks that can look like holes in the paper (it's got an excellent D-max) It's not a cheap paper ('reassuringly expensive' was probably on the minds of the marketing group that decided this). Given it took 5 prints for me to initially get a perfect one, you would want to be very careful in using it. The surface flakes were a serious problem if you didn't clean the surface thoroughly, and you should handle the paper with great care (it scratches easily). If you can justify the cost, and take care in using it, then it is a splendid paper with a distinctive look.
A personal health warning about paper reviews ;-) One of my pet hates is when I see comparative reviews of papers in some magazines that include a stack of spurious tables and diagrams covering various measurements about printer/paper/ink performance. Most are utterly meaningless (without -detailed- explanations of the theory and practice behind them). The most egregious nonsense is posting gamut volume numbers to six figure accuracy... Assume that the graphs are there to bulk out the article or make the reviewer look clever ;-) Similarly I just couldn't be bothered to measure the D-max of many papers (how black is black) - there is so much more to what makes a fine print than some spurious measurement accuracy. Note that I don't apply this when I'm making profiles, that's one time I am bothered about lots of measurements and their accuracy and their consistency. I have a few colour images that I'll print on a heavy matt rag paper. It really has quite a restricted gamut due to the ink limits I use. The images just work on that paper. Gamut and D-max are just two aspects of deciding how you want your prints to look. Print choices are a personal thing - if you just choose papers by numbers then your prints will (IMHO) lack something. Other related info
Keith is always happy to discuss matters raised in his articles. You can contact Keith at the address below. The views above represent those of Keith Cooper. Articles copyright ©2003-8 Keith Cooper. We have a version of Google's Search engine, optimised for photography related items that may be of use in finding more information... Other areas of our site that may be of interest... You can create your own customised A3 size wall calendar from a choice of 90 of Keith's images. Pick your own images for your own custom printed calendar - 12 months starting any month of the year. There are even more images in the updated gallery Digital Black and White. Based on an interview Keith gave to a magazine article about digital black and white photography. We have an expanded two part version covering some of his thoughts, techniques and tips for those interested in a digital approach to black and white. There is a growing collection of photography Articles and Reviews on the site aimed at helping you get the best out of your own photography. If you've found the information on the site of use, then please consider buying your Amazon purchases (any kinds of items) through this link to Amazon.com itemsIt won't save extra money we're afraid, but it will help in the running of the site, and we'd really appreciate it... Northlight Images is based in the UK and supplies Commercial Photography services, Training and Consultancy. Tel +44 116 2919092 New site features are always covered on the What's New page. Visiting Leicester or wondering where it is? We have views from the Leicester traffic cameras. |
|||||