Moving back to film photography
Moving back to film for my photography?
How nostalgia almost won out
It was in 2004 that Keith made his first ‘digital only’ trip abroad. The film cameras were left at home and the digital age arrived.
Recently though, much of his film equipment needed moving, could it be time to re-discover a more ‘authentic’ approach to his personal photography?
Note that this article is about Keith’s personal photographic work – given the sorts of commercial work we do (industrial and architectural), any business aspects of film use are a quite different matter.
All that kit
We’re doing some major re-arrangements of my office and print room, finding a lot of hidden dust and assorted drawers where things were safely put away at some time in the last fifteen years.
My techy/engineering side has always had a keen interest in optics and I hate getting rid of perfectly good equipment – some of it is even useful.
I’ve regularly tested old lenses with adapters on digital kit, and almost always the results are interesting, but lead me back to appreciating the advances we’ve seen in lens design over the last few years.
When I went off to Colorado in 2004 I left behind my two travel cameras – both Olympus OM-2 slrs. One would have colour slide film in it, and the other black and white.
Here they are, along with my spare OM-40 with Olympus T-32 flash and a third party power winder.
The lenses are the excellent Zuiko 24/2.8 and Zuiko 50/1.2.
Manual focus is no problem – the viewfinder of the OM-2 is bright and clear, whilst the small size of the body makes cameras like my Canon EOS 1Ds mk3 feel like a house brick.
I’ve a few other assorted Sigma and Tamron zooms, but they show their age a lot more than the Zuiko lenses.
Shingle Street and the darkroom
I’ve only a few prints in my office, but one of them is a view of Single Street in Suffolk, that I took back in the 1980’s with the OM-2/24mm (click to enlarge)
I remember first printing this image in my darkroom – the one that now has a 44″ wide large format printer in it.
The strong grain comes through in the print and reminds me of a chilly spring day on the Suffolk coast…
Another OM2/24mm image from Canada in 1992, in the Rockies (click to enlarge)
The first time I’d spent on my own driving around mountains…
OK, lets hold on a moment and put the images you see here in some context.
The Shingle Street image was never actually printed full size in my darkroom – I remember looking at the contact sheet and thinking it didn’t quite work, and filing it away with lots of other negatives.
The rapids were very difficult to print, with the trees coming out almost solid black and the sun being lost in the glare of the sky. The structure and movement of the water was never as obvious.
Both images date from my early experiments with digital editing, using a Canon FS4000 film scanner and a pre CS version of Photoshop (probably v6 – no, not CS6)
They are key images in my learning what are still two of the most powerful editing techniques I use today: curves and masked adjustment layers.
The Shingle Street image is where I truly appreciated a hefty crop and moving the horizon low, making more of the sky, and realising that no-one awarded prizes for using the whole frame.
These are images where I first experimented with black and white inkjet printing – and an appreciation of how sharpening worked for different parts of an image at a particular print size.
Here’s me with one of the first big B&W prints I made in 2004
There’s no way I could have produced that in my darkroom.
- Comparing scanners – samples from the Shingle St. negative
- Epson V850 scanner review
- Film scanner microscope – one of the first articles on the site (2003)
Lenses and autofocus
I’m happy with the quality of images I could get from those Olympus cameras and lenses, but what about the collection of Canon EF lenses I’ve got sitting near my desk? It seems almost perverse not to include them in my potential plans for film use?
I’ve manual focus lenses such as the TS-E17mm and TS-E24mm and a slew of other EF lenses I use for my day to day work, running from fisheye (EF8-15mm) through to 200mm.
Whilst I can use adapters on my Canon bodies, and have made use of the Zuiko 50/1.2, it won’t work the other way round.
So, I’d need an EF mount Canon film camera – The used price of these has picked up a bit of late, but I can get a good EOS-1V or EOS-3 for a few hundred pounds.
But hang on, one of the things I liked about those Olympus cameras when they came out of the drawer was the size and handling.
Here’s the OM-2 with the relatively large 50/1.2 compared to my current 5Ds+ EF50/1.4
If I was to get one of the Canon film cameras, it’s not much different from the Canon 1Ds I took with me on that 2004 trip to Colorado.
Seen here with the EF16-35 f2.8L lens (from my March 2004 moving to digital article)
If I go around with a Canon EOS film camera instead of one of my EOS digital bodies, what’s actually changed, other than I’ve film inside the camera rather than a digital sensor?
OK, I don’t have a preview screen on the back and I get to wait some variable amount of time between taking my photos and getting an idea of how they have come out.
I can do that with some gaffer tape and putting the memory card in a dark cupboard for a week when I get home with my digital cameras. I can shoot in manual mode (which I do a lot anyway) and stock up on 512MB cards for that limited number of shots experience.
This is the point where I start wondering just what it is I’m hoping to achieve with this return to film.
What about larger format film?
Leaving aside the handling and viewfinder quality that first set me off along this course, what about some of the other kit sitting around here?
Well, there’s a whole box full of assorted Mamiya 645 kit.
I’ve used the lenses on my Canon bodies with an M645->EF shift adapter, but the camera and all its assorted bits and pieces (viewfinders/focus screens/backs) sit waiting.
To use this kit, I’d need to address the processing and scanning of film, since I’ve no local labs and my scanner won’t do MF sized film.
There’s also my MPP 5×4 view camera, that I made a DSLR adapter for some time ago (for under a tenner) – I could quickly revert that to film use.
This starts to sound expensive and I wonder just what I’d be wanting to use them for, given the quality of lenses and cameras I already use for my day to day work?
Sure, there is a technical craft challenge in learning to use a new system, along with the inevitable ways that I find learning any new technical skill can benefit other area of my photography.
But seriously, it’s a lot of effort that I’d rather put into equipment use that is both fun and of relevance to my business – such as the recent 4700MP view of Leicester I created. This was partly because I could, but also because I wanted to share a view that not many people would ever get to see of my home city.
When I was using my 11MP Canon 1Ds, the potential benefits of film were still quite arguable – now that I’m using a 50MP EOS 5Ds and can stitch images with ease, I have a much harder time seeing what I might actually do with images I take on film. Indeed whilst writing this I had a phone enquiry from a business wanting construction project images that could be easily printed at A0 size and above.
The joys of the print
There’s no way I’m going back to wet chemistry for prints – I put a lot of effort into B&W printing last century, and it was quickly surpassed by my digital results.
If I want to print from digital negatives, then that’s a whole different craft to explore, but it isn’t something that needs me to capture images with film.
I’m also unapologetic about liking -big- prints. I remember the practical difficulties in going above 16×12 in my darkroom – that and the chances of converting a ‘spare’ room to a darkroom diminished rapidly after I stopped living on my own a few years ago :-)
At a recent photographic show, I gave a number of presentations about making big prints and how a combination of technical excellence and great images are needed.
For big prints from film I really do need more detail than I’m going to get from most 35mm film – that suggests larger format film and scanning.
Remind me again, what was it that got me thinking of this, ah yes, how nice my OM2 and 24mm lens were to handle and use.
Smaller and better
Ok, what about getting myself a modern smaller camera?
Something mirrorless, with a good viewfinder and maybe adapters to use any of my collection of lenses. That sounds interesting?
No, it was film that I’m looking at…
Not fooling myself?
The dead end I run up against when thinking of using film again is nothing to do with the expense of larger formats, or the need to scan film, or even the loss of being able to check that something is captured correctly (actually very important if you’re on a paying job).
No, it’s a genuine feeling that using film in of itself gives me nothing more from a photographic point of view (YMMV). I’ve tried, but anything I think of doing, I get the feeling that I can do it more effectively another way.
I’ve heard all kinds of creative and artistic arguments about how it helps you think differently or represents things in some different more meaningful way, but I’m sorry they just don’t cut it for me.
A fair bit of justification seems a little post hoc and perhaps driven by a feeling that digital photography is ‘too easy’ or that there is some virtue in making things more difficult for yourself.
I’m minded to suggest to suggest that:
If you think digital photography is too easy, then you are not trying hard enough.
By all means make use of film for your photographic expression, but please don’t get too carried away with the back story…
As someone who enjoys experimenting with technologies and techniques, I learned a lot from the skills needed to make effective use of film. Indeed, some of my approaches to editing images still come from an understanding of dodging and burning, along with film and print development, learned in the darkroom. However that was 25 years ago and things have moved on – a lot.
My interest is in expressing things through my photography – I’m lucky in that I get a lot of kit to experiment with and have a business that supports (and benefits from) this.
So, it seems that my film equipment is destined to be dusted and carefully returned to a safe place.
Looking at film has made me appreciate all the more just how capable the modern kit around here is.
I’m not interested in learning new [old] craft skills for the sake of it, or trying to make my photography more difficult or cumbersome.
In some ways deciding to explore film is no more than a version of that old “I need to get a better camera to take better photos line” that’s all too often used as an excuse.
I’m afraid any challenges need to come from within, and my own creative/artistic abilities. That’s far more interesting/challenging/frightening than ‘just’ going back to film.
So, what benefits might I be missing by putting the film kit back in the drawer? As ever, comments welcome ;-)
Never miss a new article or review - Sign up for our occasional (ad-free) Newsletter
Enjoyed this article?
All the latest articles/reviews and photo news items appear on Keith's Photo blog
We've a whole section of the site devoted to Digital Black and White photography and printing. It covers all of Keith's specialist articles and reviews.
For All about using tilt and shift - articles/reviews about tilt/shift lenses
Articles below by Keith (Google's picks for matching this page)