A digital pinhole camera using a 1Ds
Results are compared to a significantly more expensive lens not made of toilet paper tubes. Over 11 megapixels ought to be good for something... As ever, tinker with expensive cameras at your own risk!
Basics of the pinhole cameraThe original camera -- probably first noted a very long time ago when someone saw an inverted view of the world outside cast onto a wall through a hole in a window shutter.
For distant objects the optimum radius of the pinhole is approximately equal to the square root of the product of the wavelength of the light and the distance from the pinhole to the sensor. Thus for d=50mm and a wavelength of light of 550nm we get a pinhole radius of 0.165mm or a diameter of 1/3rd mm. For a 200mm distance to film we need a hole of 2/3rds mm. Both sizes quite easy to make, but you may need several attempts to get a good clean circular hole. A poorly shaped hole will introduce noticeable loss of quality in the image. For those of you wanting to delve into a bit more detail on the principles behind pinhole and pinspeck cameras, there is an excellent article at http://www.wesjones.com/pinhole.htm (opens in new window).
Basic pinhole adapter for a digital SLRNow comes the expensive part (apart from the ~£5000 I paid for the 1Ds body) -- £3 for a replacement camera body cap.
The image quality was rather poor and blurred. Not entirely unexpected, so I looked at a better way to get a pinhole. A better digital pinhole SLRBy enlarging the hole in the plastic cap, you can use a better material for the pinhole. Paper backed sticky Aluminium foil tape is very good and can easily be replaced. Thicker foil (take-away food containers) is good but needs glueing. Several guides on the web suggest that very thin brass sheet is best, but there was none in the tool cupboard/kitchen
After several tries I got a good sized pinhole and took the camera outside.
Note how the original image is very soft but benefits from a bit of image processing in Photoshop The processing steps were:
The last three steps are really there to optimise the picture quality on the web (I've got an article discussing photos for web use elsewhere)
It is worth trying a number of different pinhole sizes since the increase in resolution with smaller holes is offset by diffraction effects. Using the aluminium tape allowed several different pinholes to be pre-prepared. The home made 200mm lensThe lens cap pinhole gives a focal length of 50mm, how about something a little longer, and zoom too?
Two toilet paper tubes for the zoom lens. The centre of the lens cap is cut out and glued into the second tube (hot melt glue is excellent for this)
The 200mm seemed a lot more dependent on a good quality pinhole, and also susceptible to light coming through the viewfinder. The first attempts showed considerable vignetting, which turned out to be stray light. The 1Ds has a viewfinder shutter to stop this. You could use a black cloth if need be.
The expensive version -- is it really worth it?Well it can be...
If you need sharper pictures, faster f-ratios and a slightly more 'Pro' look
The moon is about half a degree across and is a critical test of any lens, particularly against a dark sky
I've a good example of the quality of this lens in part two of my article looking at the DXO Pro raw conversion and lens correction software (off-axis detail) ConclusionsI was very surprised at the quality I got out of the 50mm version after a bit of image processing. The Focus Magic plugin worked wonders and I discovered that the Photoshop 'Shadows and Highlights' tool can make appreciable differences to soft images even when set at 1% for the shadows. The smaller pinhole of the 50mm version seems to produce pictures that are easier to process for sharp results. This may be due to the amount of blur just being too much to easily correct from the larger 200mm pinhole, or it could be that the larger hole was not so good quality as the smaller one. The pinhole lens is certainly lighter to carry around, although the need for a tripod and 15 second exposures might affect its usefulness in some areas (wildlife/photojournalism). I'm not sure if I'd have got better results painting the outside of the 200mm pinhole adapter white like the 70-200, but I'm sure the red stripe helped a bit... :-) Just because I do photography for a living doesn't mean it can't still be fun! Other info and stuff on this site
There are annual world pinhole photograpy days. There is more info at http://www.pinholeday.org/ If you take pinhole pictures that day you can send them to the site.
Contact details :Northlight Images, 86 Harrow Road Leicester, Leicestershire, UK. LE3 0JW (Maps) Telephone +44 116 291 9092 You can e-mail us: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||